http://theclimatebet.com/2008/02/27/2008-international-conference-on-climate-change/ Scott Armstrong vs. Al Gore Sat, 17 May 2008 09:24:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU http://theclimatebet.com/2008/02/27/2008-international-conference-on-climate-change/#comment-252 Editor’s Note: Make your own comparisons « The Global Warming Challenge Sun, 02 Mar 2008 05:57:46 +0000 http://climatebet.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-252 [...] forecasting, global warming by climatebet on March 2nd, 2008 Recently one of our visitors, Will, wrote the following comment: “Is there somewhere on here that points out step by step the premises and conclusions of [...] [...] forecasting, global warming by climatebet on March 2nd, 2008 Recently one of our visitors, Will, wrote the following comment: “Is there somewhere on here that points out step by step the premises and conclusions of [...]

]]> http://theclimatebet.com/2008/02/27/2008-international-conference-on-climate-change/#comment-251 Bruce Cobb Sat, 01 Mar 2008 22:28:15 +0000 http://climatebet.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-251 You might want to check out this website: http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/. If you read nothing else, there is an excellent paper about 1/3 of the way down on the front page, titled "Editorial: The Great Global Warming Hoax?" by James A. Peden. You might want to check out this website: http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/.
If you read nothing else, there is an excellent paper about 1/3 of the way down on the front page, titled “Editorial: The Great Global Warming Hoax?” by James A. Peden.

]]> http://theclimatebet.com/2008/02/27/2008-international-conference-on-climate-change/#comment-236 will Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:02:58 +0000 http://climatebet.wordpress.com/?p=69#comment-236 Is there somewhere on here that points out step by step the premises and conclusions of the Inconvenient truth and states why the incorrect ones are wrong? I just see one side claiming one thing and the other side claiming the other while no real comparison can be made on the subject by laypeople. What I would like to see is the above step by step disproving of the "I.T." using scientific explanation as to why the claim is false. i.e. the statement that such and such amount of ice has melted off the poalr ice caps is simply wrong we measured it and there is such and such amount of ice still there which disproves there claim. Because when two sides of an argument state factually that a claim is one way or another than one of them is either lying or wrong. Please help me out here. Is there somewhere on here that points out step by step the premises and conclusions of the Inconvenient truth and states why the incorrect ones are wrong? I just see one side claiming one thing and the other side claiming the other while no real comparison can be made on the subject by laypeople. What I would like to see is the above step by step disproving of the “I.T.” using scientific explanation as to why the claim is false. i.e. the statement that such and such amount of ice has melted off the poalr ice caps is simply wrong we measured it and there is such and such amount of ice still there which disproves there claim. Because when two sides of an argument state factually that a claim is one way or another than one of them is either lying or wrong. Please help me out here.

]]>